lorddreadnought: (Default)




Russia’s economy may not have much to boast of these days, but it has produced one of the world’s largest crops of billionaires. Only the U.S., Germany and Japan have more. Considering the modest size of the Russian economy these days, Russia may well have the highest billionaire-to-GDP ratio in the world.

How can this be, in a nation that until recently has been on the decline?

Russia’s flawed transition from communism to a market economy in the 1990s was one of the most mishandled reforms in history. The country’s GDP declined by 41%, vast swaths of the economy were simply wiped out and the majority of the population was plunged into poverty. In the midst of this chaos a small group of insiders (nick-named the “oligarchs”) figured out how to buy the bulk of the country’s natural resources from the state at nominal prices.
The 1990s asset grab did not make the oligarchs instant billionaires-only potential ones. Potential wealth has been transformed into real wealth only in the last several years, when many of the oligarchs forswore their old pirate-capitalist ways and began paying attention to building shareholder value.

The Panama Papers leak contained more than 11.5 million documents from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, which revealed widespread tax avoidance.

More information was expected to be publicly released in the coming days, which Professor Henry said is a good opportunity for further analysis.
"So far it's been used by the ICIJ consortium of, you know, about 370 journalist have had access just to the data for a year ago or so; now it's going to be opened up," he said.

"And I think that will be very valuable because there's a lot of new kind of analysis to be done.

"As good as the journalists are, you know, they're just not as familiar with all of the intricacies is the 214,000 companies that were involved here."
Professor Henry has called for an international commission to investigate global tax avoidance and capital flight.

"If one Panamanian law firm with just 500 employers, $42 million of revenue can produce this kind of information, you know, think of what revelations about many of the other players in the world including some of the top banks would show."

More than $12tn (£8tn) has been siphoned out of Russia, China and other emerging economies into the secretive world of offshore finance, new research has revealed, as David Cameron prepares to host world leaders for an anti-corruption summit.

A detailed 18-month research project has uncovered a sharp increase in the capital flowing offshore from developing countries, in particular Russia and China.

The analysis, carried out by Columbia University professor James S Henry for theTax Justice Network, shows that by the end of 2014, $1.3tn of assets from Russia were sitting offshore. The figures, which came from compiling and cross-checking data from global institutions including the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations, follow the Panama Papers revelations of global, systemic tax avoidance.

Chinese citizens have $1.2trln stashed away in tax havens, once estimates for Hong Kong and Macau are included. Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia – all of which have seen high-profile corruption scandals in recent years – also come high on the list of the worst-affected countries.

Henry, a former chief economist at consultancy McKinsey, told the Guardian his research underlined the fact that tax-dodging was not the only motivation for using tax havens – criminals and kleptocrats also made prolific use of their services to keep their wealth secret and their money safe.




#antiwhite #media #media #israel #jew #zionism #media #jewish #jew #america #media #jewish #jew #judaism #media #jewish#jew #putin #media #jewish #wakeupamerica #media #jews #media #refugees #america #putin #jewish #jew #judaism #refugees #islam #army#aryan #azov #bankingsystem #white #nationalism #nazi #blacks #caliphate #campus #cannibalism #censorship #china #christianity #church#civilization #communism
lorddreadnought: (Default)
Карта Дня: http://joker-way.com/taro.php





Most U.S. Federal gun control legislation has been written, introduced, and sponsored by Jewish Congressmen and Jewish Senators.

Here are the Jews who want to seize the guns of American citizens:

U.S. Federal Gun Control Legislation, 1968 – 2005
1968: The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from Congressman Emanuel Celler’s House bill H.R.17735. It expands legislation already attempted by the non-Jewish Senator Thomas Dodd. America’s biggest and most far-reaching gun law came from a Jew.
1988: Senator Howard Metzenbaum sponsors Senate bill S.1523. It proposes legislation turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense, allowing a gun owner to be charged with federal racketeering offenses.
1988: Senator Howard Metzenbaum co-sponsors a bill – S.2180 – to ban, or limit/restrict, so-called “plastic guns.”
1990: Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which bans gun possession in a school zone. The law will later be struck down in court as unconstitutional.
1993: Senator Howard Metzenbaum sponsors Senate bill S.653. It bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at a later date.
February, 1994: The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy handguns, becomes effective. Senator Howard Metzenbaum wrote the Brady Bill. Senator Metzenbaum sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill in the House was Congressman Charles Schumer.
1994: Senator Howard Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka “Brady II.”Congressman Charles Schumer sponsored “Brady II” sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives.
September, 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as “assault weapons.” [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate bySenator Dianne Feinstein and authored in the House by Congressman Charles Schumer.
1995: Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg and others introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being unconstitutional.
September, 1996: The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It was sponsored by Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun.
1997: Senate bill S.54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997, proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws, including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It was introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein and Senator Hatch, among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense.
January, 1999: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.193, the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999.
January, 1999: Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety Lock Act of 1999. It would require a child safety lock in connection with transfer of a handgun.
February,1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.407, the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999.
February, 1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces S.443, the Gun Show Accountability Act of 1999.
March, 1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.560, the Gun Industry Accountability Act of 1999.
March, 1999: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.594, the Large Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999.
May, 2000: Senators Feinstein, Boxer, Lautenberg, and Schumer sponsor Senate bill S.2515, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000. It is a plan for a national firearms licensing system.
January, 2001: Senators Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer sponsor Senate bill S.25, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2001. It is a nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill].
May, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer, and others introduce legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban expired in September, 2004.
October, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin, and Schumer co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending] of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.
March, 2005: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.645, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994”] which expired in late 2004.
March, 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.620, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994”] which expired in late 2004.
July, 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1621 – Fifty-Caliber Sniper Weapons. This amendment would convert all .50 BMG firearms to NFA weapons.
July, 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1622 – Fifty-Caliber Exclusion to S.397. This amendment would modify S.397 to allow suits when the firearm involved was a .50 caliber weapon.
July, 2005: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1633 – BATFE Safety Standards. This amendment allows law suits to continue/be brought if the product did not meet the safety standards as defined by the BATFE.
July, 2005: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1634 – ‘Sporting Use’ on Domestic Handguns. Applying ’sporting use’ clause requirements to domestic handguns could, almost completely, dry up the handgun availability in the United States.

Diane Feinstein
1993: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 comes from San Francisco Jewish Congresswoman Diane Feinstein. The Bill bans the possession of semiautomatic rifles described as “assault weapons.” [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. This law is very interesting because in Israel every citizen have legal right to own such weapons. That is not double standard, that is direct sign of fear that jewish reign in US will come to an end.
Alan Dershowitz
2001: In a speech to a Jewish audience at the Jewish Community Center of Creve Coeur, Harvard Jew Alan Dershowitz said:
— “I support abolishing self-defense. No one has the right to take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. Everyone who is arming themselves for self-defense are wrong.
“I’m in favor of broad controls on guns. If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”.

The America Jewish committee is one of the most powerful Lobby Groups in America. US Senators and Congressmen are beholden to the power of the AJC which “buys” Bills that support its Jewish agenda. The American Jewish Committee brags about the number of Gun Control Laws they have helped to ram through, or rather, “buy.” According to their own Website: “The AJC has a long history of supporting Gun Control Laws, including the Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, the Federal Assault Weapon Control Act of 1989, and the Brady Handgun Prevention Act of 1993.”

Belying jewish end goal to disarm white Americans, President Barack Obama recently called for America to emulate the strict gun control laws passed in Australia nearly 20 years ago. But that Negro has forgotten that by calling for America to follow Australia’s lead regarding gun control, Obama has called for America to follow the lead of the colonists in 1776, who were finally pushed into sparking a revolution because of gun control and confiscation of firearms by the British Crown. What happened next to British crown on American continent we know well and that will happen to Obama and his black and jewish supporters if they continue with their outrageous plans.

The Second Amendment is to allow American citizens to resist government oppression and tyranny will not use the Second Amendment to resist what they see as government oppression and tyranny. Jews who has taken total control over US government and federal reserve system with trillions of dollars under their control, live in fear that some day US citizens wake up and their rule will come to an end. Because of this one of their central political goals is to facilitate legislation, which would allow the arrest and imprisonment of individuals opposed to the Zionist entity, but such legislation will never work if US nation will remain armed. 

After that Zionist Elite have a plan to Watch us closely:
1) Implantable Microchips: In 2002 Applied Digital Solutions worked to get its “VeriChip”- a biochip the size of a grain of rice containing personal data - classified as a non-regulated device. The company’s wish was granted by the FDA. Paroled prisoners, Alzheimer’s sufferers, and convicted shoplifters have all demo-ed the “VeriChip” so that authorities could keep tabs on their whereabouts.

2) Global Positioning Satellite Systems: Under current proposals US Homeland Securitywill be able to track cars by satellite & disable them by remote control.

3) PC Police: A computer device designed to spy on citizens using personal computers. Digital Future Co advertises its PC Police device as a “stealth monitoring application” that will record all keystrokes on a computer.

Emanuel Celler(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler
Howard M. Metzenbaum(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Metzenbaum
Carl M. Levin(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Levin
Thomas P. “Tom” Lantos(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Lantos
Arlen Specter(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlen_Specter
Charles E. “Chuck” Schumer(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Schumer
Frank R. Lautenberg(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Lautenberg
Barbara L. Boxer(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Boxer
Herbert H. “Herb” Kohl(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herb_Kohl
Dianne G. Feinstein(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianne_Feinstein
Jerrold L. Nadler(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerrold_Nadler
Steven R. “Steve” Rothman(Ashkenazi Jew)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Rothman






Watch also:


#antiwhite #media #antiwhite #media #israel #jew #zionism #antiwhite #media #jewish #jew #america #media #jewish #jew #judaism #media #jewish#jew #putin #media #jewish #wakeupamerica #media #jews #media #refugees #america #putin #jewish #jew #judaism #refugees #islam #army#aryan #azov #bankingsystem  #white #nationalism #nazi #blacks #caliphate #campus #cannibalism #censorship #china #christianity #church#civilization #communism
lorddreadnought: (Default)




Portland Community College plans to devote an entire month to 'whiteness'-shaming. College has designated April "Whiteness History Month" (WHM), an "educational project" exploring how the "construct of whiteness" creates racial inequality.

"'Whiteness History Month: Context, Consequences, and Change' is a multidisciplinary, district-wide, educational project examining race and racism through an exploration of the construction of whiteness, its origins, and heritage," PCC states on its website. "Scheduled for the month of April 2016, the project seeks to inspire innovative and practical solutions to community issues and social problems that stem from racism."

According to a sub-page defining the term (adapted from a definition developed by the University of Calgary), whiteness "does not simply refer to skin color[,] but [to] an ideology based on beliefs, values, behaviors, habits, and attitudes, which result in the unequal distribution of power and privilege based on skin color."

Not only does the concept of whiteness allow those who are "socially deemed white" to accrue benefits, the page asserts, but those benefits "are accrued at the expense of people of color, namely in how people of color are systemically and prejudicially denied equal access to those material benefits."

In case you haven't figured it out yet; to wit, the deliberate destruction of the white race, this article is but one example of one strategy to do away with the white race. If you think it's because of past slavery you are very wrong.

Shaming whiteness is but one strategy, another is misogyny;  who do you think Madonna, Miley, and other female celebrities are paraded around surrounded by black men in sexually explicit 'twerking' displays and why more and more black and white couples are appearing on TV and in movies. Another is by flooding the West with immigrants thereby diluting the whiteness of the nations.

Solicitude for the feelings of others and the avoidance of unnecessary offense always have been characteristics of a gentleman. Women traditionally have gone a bit further and put a high premium on being “nice,” even at the expense of truth. Elevating niceness to the ultimate virtue, however, has become possible only in a society which has completely lost its moral bearings. Such niceness is the virtue of emasculated men and women deranged by the ravings of the feminists.

Many people have the belief that the enforcement of Political Correctness is simply an effort by well-intentioned university administrators to keep the peace on campuses with increasing numbers of minority students: that the main thrust of their effort has been to restrain uncivil students from using expressions like “kike” or “nigger” or “queer” or “bitch” in referring to their fellow students, thereby giving offense and disrupting the orderly climate of learning. People with this belief generally regard anecdotes of the sort cited here as evidence that in a few cases the efforts to maintain civility have become a little overzealous and have gone a little too far in the direction of restricting speech and other forms of expression. They tend to believe that what we need to do is guard against these excesses and protect the freedoms of students and faculty members to protect their First Amendment rights — within reasonable limits, of course.

Such people miss the whole point. The drive for Political Correctness is not an overzealous effort to maintain an orderly learning environment at our universities; on the contrary, it is a manifestation of the determination of certain elements inside and outside the universities to insure that the universities not be permitted to perform their traditional function of educating and civilizing a leadership elite for the next generation of Americans.

Some simply didn’t have the courage to come right out and say that the bearers of Western civilization had committed a collective act of suicide by engaging in the Second World War: that America and Britain, in particular, had been tricked into fighting against everything on which the cultural ascendency of the West is based, and that now they must either repudiate their role in the war or look forward to the eventual abandonment of their heritage altogether. Had the war not been fought in the name of equality and democracy, and is that not what Political Correctness is all about?

Others had already developed the habit of moral ambiguity, and it was easier to compromise even further than to draw a line and take a stand.

The second postwar generation (i.e, those entering their professions during the quarter-century since about 1965) grew up in the television age and went through puberty under the influence of the Beatles, the Students for a Democratic Society, the Yippies, and the media deification of Martin Luther King; with cities being set to the torch by Black rioters and looters, while the media and the politicians blamed “White racism” for the turmoil; with permissiveness, the denial of individual accountability, the belief that all points of view are equally valid, and protests against every form of authority. The youngest members of this generation were weaned on Sesame Street and sent to racially integrated schools.

They grew up, in other words, in a time of cultural, moral, and racial chaos, and they reached maturity with no clear sense of identity, no firm cultural roots, and no moral bedrock as a basis for their values. They were ready to go with the flow, wherever it might lead: to take their direction from anyone with a loud enough voice.

This moral vacuum provided the perfect opportunity for any interest group which could organize itself on a large enough scale for its voice to be heard. Many groups organized, and the media perversely provided the loudest megaphones for precisely those with the most destructive aims. The feminists, the homosexuals, and the racial minority activists, who in healthier times would be sent scurrying back to their holes, were first tolerated on the campuses and later welcomed with open arms.

There they have formed an interest bloc strong enough to swing an increasing amount of weight in setting policy. Despite their diversity they have a common hatred which unites them: a raging, burning hatred for the White, heterosexual, patriarchal society which abhorred and rejected them.

The aim of the cadres of Political Correctness is not merely to make Blacks feel good about themselves by convincing them that their ancestors were founders of great civilizations and that the only reason for their own non-achievement is “oppression” by Whites. It is, more urgently, to squelch White racial consciousness and pride. It is to confuse heterosexual White males (and females), to keep them off balance, to make them feel apologetic, even guilty. It is to morally disarm “the killers,” to emasculate them, to prepare them to accept annihilation quietly.

Greatness cannot exist with egalitarianism, however. Most of America’s universities are beyond redemption today. One can put down the loonies and chase the freaks and aliens off the campuses, but one cannot put a sense of honor back into academics who compromised theirs away. And without honor one cannot expect truth to prevail.

The universities will, however, be a battleground through the coming years, and the combatants will not be just the PC cadres and the reactionaries now pretending to hold them in check; there also will be those who understand the fundamentals and fight on that basis. Perhaps one day we all will be grateful to the minions of Political Correctness for having drawn for us in such bold and clear strokes the real meaning of egalitarianism and thereby give us the impetus to do what is necessary to deal with this disease of the soul.



#antiwhite #media #media #israel #jew #zionism #media #jewish #jew #america #media #jewish #jew #judaism #media #jewish#jew #putin #media #jewish #wakeupamerica #media #jews #media #refugees #america #putin #jewish #jew #judaism #refugees #islam #army#aryan #azov #bankingsystem #white #nationalism #nazi #blacks #caliphate #campus #cannibalism #censorship #china #christianity #church#civilization #communism

Profile

lorddreadnought: (Default)
lorddreadnought

August 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 03:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios